Advisors

Retirement vs. emergency savings: How to prioritize in a shaky economy

Products You May Like

Jamie Grill | Getty Images

When you’re on a tight budget, It can be tough to decide between contributing to your retirement savings or to your emergency fund — especially during periods of economic uncertainty.

And the banking crisis has added to fears of a recession, with further stock market volatility triggered by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.

Although the 401(k) contribution limit jumped to $22,500 for 2023, experts say you shouldn’t forgo emergency savings to max out your plan.

More from The New Road to Retirement:

Here’s a look at more retirement news.

  • Some experts argue Social Security retirement age should not pass 67
  • Here’s how to earn $65K a year just in interest
  • The return on waiting to claim Social Security is ‘huge’

More than half of savers are prioritizing short-term financial goals in 2023, including emergency savings, according to a recent study from Fidelity Investments. And a recent Personal Capital survey found building an emergency fund is a top priority for 2023.

“It’s always a balance,” said certified financial planner Catherine Valega, founder of Green Bee Advisory in Boston. While maxing out your 401(k) should be the goal, your emergency savings is also important, she said.

Aim for your full 401(k) match

Leslie Beck, a Rutherford, New Jersey-based CFP and owner of Compass Wealth Management, said she has a “rule of thumb” for how to decide between retirement and emergency savings.

She always recommends contributing enough money to your 401(k) to get the full company match. If your emergency savings are short after that, you should “definitely” divert any additional funds to build up that cash reserve, she said.

How much you need for emergency savings

Guido Mieth | DigitalVision | Getty Images

If you’re single, Beck suggests keeping “close to a year’s worth of essential expenses” to cover necessities such as your home, food and utilities. Other advisers have recommended three months to one year of expenses, depending on your situation.

“You should have a year’s worth [of essential expenses] in case there’s a downturn in the employment market, which we may or may not be heading into,” she said, noting that it often takes longer than expected to find a job after a layoff, especially for higher-compensated employees.

However, her recommendation changes for dual-earning couples. “I cut that back to six months, maybe even three months, depending on what industry you’re employed in,” she said. 

And there may be some flexibility if you have access to a home equity line of credit, which may be another source of cash for emergency expenses, Beck said. But you need to be “very judicious” when tapping equity because borrowing after a job loss can put your home at risk, she said.

Valega suggests an emergency fund of 12 to 18 months of expenses, admitting that she’s “more conservative than most,” but says the exact number depends on your career sector and personal preference. For example, she may encourage clients in tech to set aside more than health-care workers.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

You can work at McDonald’s and still become a millionaire, a financial psychologist says
Toyota says California-led EV mandates are ‘impossible’ as states fall short of goal
Singapore Airlines shares fall 6% as profit nearly halves amid intensifying competition
Home Depot’s sales are improving, but it says consumers are still cautious about spending
Megacap tech stocks make some room — here is where investors are branching out